No Nits, No Compromise
A "No Nits" policy is the school nurse's version of Zero Tolerance: Any sign of lice -- living, dead or gestating -- and you're out of there. If you're looking at things from a purely pest-control perspective, that makes a lot of sense. The only good head is a clean head. Nits may not be a threat while they're in that form, but they'll eventually hatch out as lice, and who knows the exact moment that will occur? Better safe than sorry.
The leading proponent of that position is the National Pediculosis Association, which stands unwaveringly by the conviction that the only way to stop the cycle of lice infestation and re-infestation is to keep kids out of school until every last nit is picked. Any less-consistent policy is just a recipe for more lice, more missed school, more pesticide shampoo, and more pesticide-resistant bugs. According to an NPA press release, "Industry sponsored guidelines developed in 2000 to promote sales of pesticide treatments for head lice continue to be used as the basis of allowing lice infested children to remain in the classroom. Parents across the country are fighting back!" Policies that keep nit-headed kids out of classrooms are necessary, the association says, to maintain community standards, teach kids about good health habits, urge families toward responsibility, and reduce the need for chemical treatments.
That certainly sounds reasonable. Who would argue with the firm handling of a public health crisis?
No Nits? No NeedWell, the American Academy of Pediatrics, for one. Also the National Association of School Nurses (NASN), and the Harvard School of Public Health.
Their argument is that head lice are not a public health crisis at all, not harmful to anything but our delicate sensibilities, and that therefore kicking kids out of school to keep lice at bay is an unnecessary overreaction. It's made worse by the fact that truly determining a child is nit-free -- without mistaking things like dandruff, lint, and dead nit remnants for actual eggs -- is a tricky and oft-mishandled process.
The NASN's position statement tallies up some of the cost of head-lice hysteria: "Embarrassment and social stigma frequently accompany identification of infestation. Schools may be blamed as the source of contraction for students. Historically, in an effort to decrease head lice infestations, many U.S. schools adopted 'no nit' policies. Subsequently, schools report extended student absences related to chronic infestation in certain students. Study of attendance records found 12 to 24 million school days are lost annually in the U.S. due to exclusion of students for nits .... Exclusion from school for any reason has been correlated with truancy ... as well as with poor academic performance."
In the end, it appears that the only real harm a head louse does is to keep a kid out of school. And if that's so, is keeping kids out of school the best way to solve the problem? Are parents going into frenzies of chemical use and house cleaning and hair pulling to get rid of bad bugs, or get kids back in school? If lice didn't result in missed classes, missed work, social judgment and the potential for disrupting the lives of one's peers, would we even care all that much about them? It's worth noting that, while the opponents of No Nits policies may be following guidelines set by shampoo manufacturers, the proponents of No Nits policies are selling nit combs.
Where It Stands
Lest you think this doesn't apply to your special-ed child, since the IDEA provides a legal right to schooling and compensatory education will have to be provided if the administration tries to exclude him or her, think again. A Pennsylvania court, in denying compensatory education to a disabled student kept out of school 19 days due to a head lice infestation, ruled that IDEA protections that apply if a child in special education is expelled or suspended for more than 10 days due to behavior problems are not required if the same child is kicked out as the result of a No Nits policy. So No Nits isn't really the health equivalent of Zero Tolerance -- it's stronger.
Given that, and knowing of the difficulties that parents of students with special needs may have in ridding their children of all traces of head lice, is it paranoid to worry that administrators may stop fighting to remove troublesome special education students through disciplinary actions and just start dropping bugs in their hair?
Where does your opinion lie on lice? Should schools be able to keep kids out indefinitely to prevent bug breakouts? Stop by the Parenting Special Needs Forum and sound off. Then share your favorite strategy for getting rid of the little buggers.